TORONTO -- Don't just do some thing, stand there.
If only a lot more politicians would take this advice and resist the temptation to tackle every perceived problem by the easy expedient of throwing our revenue -- taxpayers' dollars -- at it, then the world will be a far better location.
Take the atmosphere as an instance. Please.
In 1999, Mike Harris decided it will be a super idea to do something about automobile emissions in general and greenhouse gasses in particular.
Enter the Drive Clean scheme.
He argued that if our autos could possibly be tested for the amount of polluting particulates they send in to the atmosphere, the environment would advantage.
The logic determined that the worst polluters would either be taken off the road, repaired -- or both.
Further, why not institute a user-pay fee to go with this testing regime?
Then make it a compulsory act of accountable citizenship to have automobiles tested at officially sanctioned stations just before vehicles could be licenced as road worthy.
How very simple is that? Practically nothing could go incorrect.
As all of us now know to our considerable economic price, a lot could go wrong. And did.
The testing regime seemed flawed from day one. No amount of tinkering due to the fact has convinced everyone of its helpful objective.
Older pre-1988 cars, these most likely to become seen to be polluting our atmosphere, have been often exempt.
More and more modern day vehicles passed simply due to the combination of far better standards of fuel and enhanced, far more efficient engine design and style.
So, a test to get a test's sake inside the blessed name of saving the environment lived on ... and on ... and on.
Certainly, no government given that Mike Harris' has attempted to send Drive Clean down a side street and into oblivion -- despite the fact that the original British Columbia scheme it was modelled on is already being junked.
The province's auditor basic, Jim McCarter, has created it clear that in his view "the reduction in car emissions in Ontario is due largely to elements other than the system," a claim featured as portion of his 2012 annual report.
McCarter credited "better manufacturing standards for emission-control gear and federal requirements for cleaner fuel" to get a decline in failed tests as an alternative to the testing regime itself.
He added it could not make sense to charge drivers $30 million per year when the failure rate is as low as reported.
So if Drive Clean was meant to test the capability of cars within the province to become road worthy, then we were (are) all passing with flying colours.
From 1999 to 2010, the failure price for Drive Clean's e-test steadily declined to 5% -- down from 16%.
The only flaw has come because the introduction of a brand new computerized test this year for light-duty cars equipped with an on-board diagnostics (OBD) method.
The preceding tailpipe test, which can be a correct measure of emissions, has been replaced using a computerized examination that scans the on-board diagnostics (OBD) systems in automobiles.
That has observed failure price jump to ten.5% considering the fact that Jan. 1.
Mechanics are quick to point out this anomaly has much less to complete with inefficiencies in the engines and more to complete with the flawed onboard electronics which are a feature of modern day engine design and style.
"A day or two of typical highway and city driving will ordinarily reset your vehicle's personal computer and assure it is prepared for the test," would be the helpful advice from Drive Clean for all those who fail their initially attempt.
Think how much fuel, time and power is therefore devoted to passing the test which is created to lessen the quantity of fuel, time and power we waste within the course of our daily lives.
So sufficient is adequate.
It's time for Kathleen Wynne to admit that Drive Clean can be a blatant tax grab, delivering upwards of $30 million a year into government coffers since revenues are exceeding testing expenditures.
The only thing being cleaned out would be the taxpayer wallet.
view extra about obd2 tools: http://diyobd2fr.blog.com/
http://spobd2.blog.fc2blog.net/
没有评论:
发表评论